Xomnia vs WeAreBrain: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: July 2026
Quick verdict
Xomnia (4.3/5) edges ahead of WeAreBrain (4.3/5) overall. Xomnia is the better choice for dutch and Northwest European enterprises wanting a single consultancy for data strategy, cloud data platforms, and applied or agentic AI delivery.. WeAreBrain is the stronger option for startups and scale-ups wanting AI-native product development combined with broader software modernization, not just an isolated ML model.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Xomnia vs WeAreBrain: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Xomnia | WeAreBrain |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2015 |
| HQ | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Netherlands (internationally distributed team) |
| Team size | 135+ (post-Aurai acquisition, 2025) | 60+ |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Best for | Dutch and Northwest European enterprises wanting a single consultancy for data strategy, cloud data platforms, and applied or agentic AI delivery. | Startups and scale-ups wanting AI-native product development combined with broader software modernization, not just an isolated ML model. |
| Pricing model | Consulting retainer, dedicated team | Dedicated team, fixed project |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Python, Cloud data platforms, Agentic AI frameworks | Python, AI product tooling, Shopify/SAP Commerce Cloud integrations |
| Industries served | Retail/E-commerce, Energy & Utilities, Healthcare, Financial Services, Public Sector | Transport & Logistics, Healthcare, EdTech, Retail/E-commerce |
Xomnia vs WeAreBrain: overview
Xomnia
Xomnia is an Amsterdam, Netherlands data-and-AI consultancy founded in 2013, covering data strategy, cloud data platforms, agentic AI, and EU-hosted cloud solutions. In June 2025 it acquired Aurai specifically to scale toward becoming Northwest Europe's leading data and AI consultancy, growing its collective team past 135 specialists. Its client roster includes Rabobank, Vodafone Ziggo, ProRail, and NS (per company website), spanning retail, mobility, energy, healthcare, and public-sector work.
WeAreBrain
WeAreBrain is a Netherlands-headquartered AI-native product studio founded in 2015, combining AI product development with software modernization, e-commerce integrations, and automation services. It describes itself as 'a winning team, not an agency,' with a 60+ person, 13-nationality team and an average client tenure of 3.8 years, alongside an NPS score above 80 (per company website). Named clients include SidelineSwap and clevergig, which was acquired by Visma.
Services and capabilities: Xomnia vs WeAreBrain
| Capability | Xomnia | WeAreBrain |
|---|---|---|
| ML Development | ✗ | ✓ |
| AI Consulting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Computer Vision | ✗ | ✗ |
| NLP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Generative AI | ✓ | ✓ |
| MLOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Data Engineering | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff Augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Xomnia vs WeAreBrain
| Framework / platform | Xomnia | WeAreBrain |
|---|---|---|
| Python | ✓ | ✓ |
| AWS | N/A | N/A |
| Microsoft Azure | N/A | N/A |
| Google Cloud | N/A | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
| PyTorch | N/A | N/A |
| LangChain | N/A | N/A |
| Databricks | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Xomnia vs WeAreBrain
| Criterion | Xomnia | WeAreBrain |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Consulting retainer, Dedicated team, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Enterprise / mid-market | Enterprise / mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Xomnia vs WeAreBrain
| Dimension | Xomnia | WeAreBrain |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Retail/E-commerce, Energy & Utilities, Healthcare | Transport & Logistics, Healthcare, EdTech |
| Best use cases | Enterprise data and AI strategy roadmaps, Cloud data platform builds | AI-native product MVP development, E-commerce AI personalization |
| Typical project type | Consulting retainer | Dedicated team |
Xomnia vs WeAreBrain: pros and cons
| Xomnia | |
|---|---|
| + | Long, blue-chip client list including Rabobank, Vodafone Ziggo, ProRail, and NS (per company website) |
| + | 2025 Aurai acquisition materially increased delivery capacity and breadth |
| + | EU-hosted cloud solutions directly address data-residency concerns for Dutch and EU clients |
| + | Founded 2013 — over a decade of Netherlands market presence |
| - | Recent acquisition (Aurai, 2025) means integrated team structure and delivery consistency are still settling |
| - | Broad data-and-AI positioning is less narrowly specialized than pure-play ML boutiques on this list |
| - | Pricing and minimum engagement are not published |
| WeAreBrain | |
|---|---|
| + | 80+ NPS and 3.8-year average client tenure signal strong retention (per company website) |
| + | 13-nationality team supports multilingual, multi-market European delivery |
| + | Combines AI-native product development with broader software modernization services |
| + | Founded 2015 with a decade of continuous operation |
| - | Broader software, e-commerce, and automation service lines mean ML is one of several offerings, not the sole focus |
| - | 60+ team size is modest relative to enterprise-scale competitors on this list |
| - | Notable named clients (SidelineSwap, clevergig) are smaller-profile than some competitors' enterprise logos |
Who should choose Xomnia?
Xomnia is the right choice for dutch and Northwest European enterprises wanting a single consultancy for data strategy, cloud data platforms, and applied or agentic AI delivery..
Acquired Aurai in 2025 specifically to consolidate strategy, platform, and applied-AI capability under one roof as it scales toward regional market leadership.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Retail/E-commerce, Energy & Utilities, Healthcare, Financial Services, Public Sector.
Who should choose WeAreBrain?
WeAreBrain is the right choice for startups and scale-ups wanting AI-native product development combined with broader software modernization, not just an isolated ML model..
Frames itself around culture and retention — 'a winning team, not an agency' — with a long average client tenure as central to its pitch alongside technical delivery.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Transport & Logistics, Healthcare, EdTech, Retail/E-commerce.
Decision matrix: Xomnia vs WeAreBrain
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Xomnia |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Xomnia |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Xomnia (Not published) vs WeAreBrain (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Xomnia |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Xomnia |
Use case fit: Xomnia vs WeAreBrain
| Use case | Xomnia fit | WeAreBrain fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise data and AI strategy roadmaps | Strong | Limited | Xomnia |
| Cloud data platform builds | Strong | Limited | Xomnia |
| AI-native product MVP development | Limited | Strong | WeAreBrain |
| E-commerce AI personalization | Limited | Strong | WeAreBrain |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Xomnia vs WeAreBrain
Xomnia (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. Acquired Aurai in 2025 specifically to consolidate strategy, platform, and applied-AI capability under one roof as it scales toward regional market leadership.. It is best for dutch and Northwest European enterprises wanting a single consultancy for data strategy, cloud data platforms, and applied or agentic AI delivery..
WeAreBrain (4.3/5) is the better choice when startups and scale-ups wanting AI-native product development combined with broader software modernization, not just an isolated ML model.. If your situation matches those criteria, WeAreBrain is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Xomnia vs WeAreBrain FAQ
Is Xomnia better than WeAreBrain?
Xomnia (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Xomnia is better for dutch and Northwest European enterprises wanting a single consultancy for data strategy, cloud data platforms, and applied or agentic AI delivery.. WeAreBrain is better for startups and scale-ups wanting AI-native product development combined with broader software modernization, not just an isolated ML model..
How do Xomnia and WeAreBrain differ in pricing?
Xomnia uses consulting retainer, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. WeAreBrain uses dedicated team, fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Xomnia or WeAreBrain?
Xomnia is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Xomnia and WeAreBrain?
Xomnia's primary differentiator is: acquired aurai in 2025 specifically to consolidate strategy, platform, and applied-ai capability under one roof as it scales toward regional market leadership.. WeAreBrain's primary differentiator is: frames itself around culture and retention — 'a winning team, not an agency' — with a long average client tenure as central to its pitch alongside technical delivery.. They also differ in team size (135+ (post-Aurai acquisition, 2025) vs 60+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Retail/E-commerce, Energy & Utilities vs Transport & Logistics, Healthcare).
Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.