InData Labs
Cyprus-headquartered data science firm with its own R&D center, founded by a video-gaming industry veteran.
Founded 2014 | Nicosia, Cyprus (R&D and delivery centers in Lithuania and the US) | 80+ employees | Last updated: July 2026
ml-developmentai-consultingdata-engineeringgenerative-ai
What is InData Labs?
InData Labs is a data science and AI consultancy legally headquartered in Nicosia, Cyprus, founded in 2014 by video-gaming industry veteran Marat Karpeko, with R&D and delivery centers in Lithuania and the US. The 80+ person firm runs its own R&D center and covers a wide technical band from generative AI and GPT integration through predictive analytics, forecasting, and computer vision. Its Cyprus legal HQ gives clients an EU-entity contracting structure alongside nearshore delivery capacity.
InData Labs was founded in 2014 and is headquartered in Nicosia, Cyprus (R&D and delivery centers in Lithuania and the US). The firm employs 80+ people and works primarily with clients in Cross-industry, Predictive Analytics sectors. Its primary differentiator is: Runs its own R&D center rather than purely project-based delivery, spanning generative AI/GPT integration through classic predictive analytics and computer vision..
InData Labs tech stack and services
PythonGenerative AI/GPT toolingComputer vision frameworksBig data pipelines
| Service area | Details |
|---|---|
| Generative AI and GPT integration projects | Available for Cross-industry, Predictive Analytics clients |
| Predictive analytics and forecasting | Available for Cross-industry, Predictive Analytics clients |
| Computer vision pilots | Available for Cross-industry, Predictive Analytics clients |
| Big data infrastructure builds | Available for Cross-industry, Predictive Analytics clients |
InData Labs use cases
Short answer: InData Labs is best suited for companies wanting a decade-plus data science track record with in-house R&D rather than a pure project-delivery shop..
| Use case | Industries | Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Generative AI and GPT integration projects | Cross-industry, Predictive Analytics | Python, Generative AI/GPT tooling |
| Predictive analytics and forecasting | Cross-industry, Predictive Analytics | Python, Generative AI/GPT tooling |
| Computer vision pilots | Cross-industry, Predictive Analytics | Python, Generative AI/GPT tooling |
| Big data infrastructure builds | Cross-industry, Predictive Analytics | Python, Generative AI/GPT tooling |
InData Labs pricing
Short answer: InData Labs uses a fixed project, time & materials pricing approach. Minimum engagement starts at Not published.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed project | From Not published | Well-defined scope |
| Time & Materials | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
InData Labs does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.
InData Labs pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +Founded 2014 — one of the longer-running boutique data science firms in this list | -80+ employee band is imprecise — exact current headcount is not independently published |
| +In-house R&D center is a differentiator versus pure staff-augmentation vendors | -Legal HQ (Cyprus) is a smaller AI hub than its Lithuania delivery center, which may matter to buyers wanting an on-the-ground presence |
| +Cyprus legal HQ with Lithuania/US delivery centers gives EU-entity contracting plus nearshore delivery | -Pricing model and minimum engagement are not published |
| +Broad technical range from generative AI to classic forecasting and computer vision |
InData Labs vs alternatives
How InData Labs compares to the other top Machine Learning Development companies.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dida Datenschmiede | Organizations that need a tightly-scoped, research-grade ML solution... | Team composed primarily of mathematicians and physicists, explicitly rejecting black-box tooling in favor of custom-built models as its sole service line. | 4.8 | Full comparison |
| Tensorway | Mid-market fintech, energy, and supply-chain companies that want... | Spun out of Anadea's applied R&D unit in 2019, giving it a mature delivery bench uncommon for a five-year-old AI boutique. | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| NILG.AI | Companies earlier in their AI adoption curve that... | Founder-led by a University of Porto PhD with a public AI-education arm (100K+ YouTube subscribers, Microsoft education partner) that doubles as a technical credibility signal. | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Neurons Lab | Financial-services firms that need agentic AI systems with... | Positions itself as an end-to-end AI enablement partner specifically for financial services, with governance and compliance tooling built into the core offer rather than added on. | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Addepto | Mid-market to enterprise buyers in aviation, logistics, or... | Explicit 'proof-of-concept to production' positioning addresses the common failure mode where enterprise ML pilots never reach deployment. | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| Xomnia | Dutch and Northwest European enterprises wanting a single... | Acquired Aurai in 2025 specifically to consolidate strategy, platform, and applied-AI capability under one roof as it scales toward regional market leadership. | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| WeAreBrain | Startups and scale-ups wanting AI-native product development combined... | Frames itself around culture and retention — 'a winning team, not an agency' — with a long average client tenure as central to its pitch alongside technical delivery. | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Deeper Insights | Enterprises across healthcare, real estate, and financial services... | Team holds 500+ citations and patents globally (per company website), signaling research depth rather than a purely delivery-focused staffing model. | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Alexander Thamm | Large German and DACH-region enterprises — especially automotive... | 'Whitebox solutions' positioning emphasizes transparency and manufacturer independence, backed by 3,500+ completed projects and blue-chip automotive clients. | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Nexocode | Startups and scale-ups wanting a small, senior AI... | Explicitly flat organizational structure with no traditional management hierarchy — every team member is described as equally involved in growth and delivery decisions. | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Predli | Organizations wanting a structured path from first AI... | 'Predli Studio' is a dedicated build function that turns AI strategy directly into production-grade custom solutions, rather than handing delivery to a separate vendor. | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Synergy Labs | French and EU businesses wanting practical, dashboard- and... | Focuses specifically on business-facing applied ML — smart dashboards, customer segmentation, recommendation engines — built to EU compliance rules, rather than broad AI R&D. | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| xtream | Italian and pan-European scale-ups wanting AI features embedded... | Combines UX design, product management, and software engineering with applied ML and BI — AI is delivered as part of a full digital-product build, not a bolt-on service. | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| element61 | Belgian and Benelux enterprises wanting a long-established analytics... | Started as an analytics and performance-management consultancy in 2007 and layered data science and AI on top of an already-mature BI practice, combining both under one roof. | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Miquido | Companies wanting AI and ML features — RAG,... | Offers on-device AI development and AI guardrails alongside core ML, computer vision, and NLP work — a more product-engineering-centric AI offering than pure consulting-first competitors. | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Neoteric | Companies wanting a well-reviewed, mid-size Polish AI and... | 4.9/5 rating across 70 verified Clutch reviews and 300+ completed projects across five continents gives an unusually large, independently verifiable review base for a company of this size. | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Grape Up | Automotive and finance enterprises wanting agentic AI and... | Built its own productized platforms (Databoostr, Cloudboostr) alongside custom delivery — a hybrid product-plus-services model less common among pure consultancies on this list. | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Deviniti | Enterprises in regulated or complex sectors wanting generative... | 50+ Atlassian-certified professionals and Atlassian Partner of the Year finalist status give it unusually strong enterprise-IT integration credibility alongside its generative AI practice and Bielik.AI open-source contributions. | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| STX Next | Enterprises wanting Python-native ML and AI engineering from... | Built and open-sourced DeepNext, an autonomous AI developer agent, and holds AWS Advanced Tier, Snowflake, Databricks, Azure, and Amazon Bedrock partnerships simultaneously. | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| CN Group CZ | Nordic, German, and Austrian enterprises wanting an established,... | Combines Scandinavian management style with Czech, Slovak, and Romanian engineering talent, and layers AI/ML onto a much older core business in embedded systems and industrial automation. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| ASSIST Software | Manufacturing and agriculture clients in the DACH region... | Runs 25+ active R&D projects and participates in 25+ EU-funded research programs alongside 160+ research-institution partnerships — an unusually research-heavy profile for a 30+ year old nearshore vendor. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Software Mind | Large enterprises wanting AI/ML delivered alongside broader custom... | 48-month average client relationship length and ISO 9001/14001/27001 certification stack signal an enterprise-process-mature vendor built for long-term programs rather than short AI pilots. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Future Processing | Insurance, finance, and energy enterprises wanting an outcome-based... | Publicly states that 95% of generative AI pilots deliver no measurable return and positions its own outcome-based delivery approach against that failure pattern, backed by named case studies with hard percentage metrics. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| SPD Technology | Fintech and payments companies wanting AI/ML delivered by... | Secured direct partnerships with OpenAI, Anthropic, and AWS specifically to reinforce its cloud and AI/ML capabilities — a more direct foundation-model-vendor relationship than most peers on this list disclose. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Zühlke | Large regulated enterprises — medtech, finance, industrial —... | Founded in 1968 as a product-innovation engineering firm, giving it a far longer institutional track record than any other company on this list — AI/ML is one current-generation capability within a much broader innovation-consulting practice. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Arnia Software | Companies needing deep R&D-level engineering — database engines,... | Machine learning expertise grew out of Arnia's original R&D work in database engines and operating systems, giving it lower-level systems engineering depth uncommon among application-focused AI vendors on this list. | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Reaktor | Enterprises wanting AI capability embedded within a broader... | Co-created 'Elements of AI,' a free AI literacy MOOC with the University of Helsinki taken by over half a million people worldwide — a public-education contribution unmatched by any other company on this list. | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Framna | Nordic and Benelux enterprises wanting mobile-first digital product... | Formed in 2023 through the merger of three established agencies backed by Waterland Private Equity, giving it unusually broad simultaneous coverage of Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Poland under one group. | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| N-iX | Large enterprises wanting AI-augmented software engineering at significant... | Legally headquartered in Valletta, Malta, with its primary engineering hub historically in Lviv, Ukraine; relocated 600+ Ukrainian engineers to safety in 2022 without dropping a single client project, and reports zero delivery disruptions since founding in 2002. | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Sigma Software | Large enterprises wanting a Swedish-incorporated, EU-contractable IT consultancy... | 60% owned by the Swedish Sigma Group since 2006, giving Sigma Software a Swedish corporate parent and legal entity while its founding engineering culture and historical delivery base trace to Kharkiv, Ukraine. | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Nordcloud (an IBM Company) | Large enterprises already committed to a major public... | Acquired by IBM in 2020 and now operates as an IBM subsidiary, giving it direct backing from one of the largest enterprise technology vendors globally, while holding all three major cloud certifications simultaneously. | 3.7 | Full comparison |
InData Labs FAQ
What is InData Labs?
InData Labs is a data science and AI consultancy legally headquartered in Nicosia, Cyprus, founded in 2014 by video-gaming industry veteran Marat Karpeko, with R&D and delivery centers in Lithuania and the US. The 80+ person firm runs its own R&D center and covers a wide technical band from generative AI and GPT integration through predictive analytics, forecasting, and computer vision. Its Cyprus legal HQ gives clients an EU-entity contracting structure alongside nearshore delivery capacity.
How much does InData Labs charge?
InData Labs uses fixed project, time & materials pricing. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does InData Labs use?
InData Labs works with Python, Generative AI/GPT tooling, Computer vision frameworks, Big data pipelines. Primary industries served include Cross-industry, Predictive Analytics.
Is InData Labs right for enterprise?
Companies wanting a decade-plus data science track record with in-house R&D rather than a pure project-delivery shop.. 80+ team size. Key consideration: 80+ employee band is imprecise — exact current headcount is not independently published.
What are the best InData Labs alternatives?
The best alternatives to InData Labs depend on your use case. Top options are:
- dida Datenschmiede: team composed primarily of mathematicians and physicists, explicitly rejecting black-box tooling in favor of custom-built models as its sole service line.
- Tensorway: spun out of anadea's applied r&d unit in 2019, giving it a mature delivery bench uncommon for a five-year-old ai boutique.
- NILG.AI: founder-led by a university of porto phd with a public ai-education arm (100k+ youtube subscribers, microsoft education partner) that doubles as a technical credibility signal.
Compare InData Labs with other Machine Learning Development companies
InData Labs vs dida Datenschmiede InData Labs vs Tensorway InData Labs vs NILG.AI InData Labs vs Neurons Lab InData Labs vs Addepto InData Labs vs Xomnia InData Labs vs WeAreBrain InData Labs vs Deeper Insights InData Labs vs Alexander Thamm InData Labs vs Nexocode InData Labs vs Predli InData Labs vs Synergy Labs InData Labs vs xtream InData Labs vs element61 InData Labs vs Miquido InData Labs vs Neoteric InData Labs vs Grape Up InData Labs vs Deviniti InData Labs vs STX Next InData Labs vs CN Group CZ InData Labs vs ASSIST Software InData Labs vs Software Mind InData Labs vs Future Processing InData Labs vs SPD Technology InData Labs vs Zühlke InData Labs vs Arnia Software InData Labs vs Reaktor InData Labs vs Framna InData Labs vs N-iX InData Labs vs Sigma Software InData Labs vs Nordcloud (an IBM Company)
Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with InData Labs before making a decision.